By Mark Conlon
Much has been said in recent years of the use of "crisis actors"
involved in relation to 9/11 and a number of "staged"
terrorist attacks that followed. Much of the early promotion of "crisis
actors" was by Simon Shack following his September Clues film and his
September Clues forum.
One of the most famous 9/11 cases was the "Harley Guy" on Fox News
who gave an account of the "official" 9/11 WTC building
collapse story from the beginning. Or did he?
There has been many people who believe the "Harley Guy" to be a
professional actor Mark Adrian Humphries. Humphries denied these claims and of
any involvement on 9/11. Humphries claimed he was in Los Angeles at the time of
the 9/11 attacks. See image below: Taken from Simon Shack's - September Clues forum.
See Image below:
Here is the Google Earth link which shows the proximity of
Mark Walsh's building to the WTC towers (satellite view). http://g.co/maps/mkr7w
The full length original broadcast can be found on this link: http://podbay.fm/show/277283542/e/130...
Also, here's a clip from the Opie & Anthony Show from 9/11/01 where they
talk about Mark Walsh living near the WTC and him witnessing the attacks from
his apartment and appearing on TV with Fox News that morning. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYKqBC...
In conclusion:
It is clear to see that "Harley Guy" is in fact Mark Walsh and not
Mark Adrian Humphries a professional actor. Clearly, misinformation was
circulated by certain so-called 9/11 researchers. Was this done to help create
a later "Psy-Op" regarding "crisis actors", which seems to
play a role in many of today's "conspiracy theories" involving "fake"
terrorist attacks?
Another note to consider: Most people have said how cool Mark Walsh looks when
delivering his lines on 9/11. I don't recognise this, and in my opinion I see
someone who was quite anxious, who couldn't stand still, and was talking quite
quickly and looks flustered.
Also, because Mark Walsh was working freelance for Fox News that day, is it
possible that he got his "official" information
regarding the WTC buildings collapses straight from Fox News and inadvertently
repeated what he had been informed had happened to the WTC buildings into his
own recollections of his own experience during the interview unknowingly? Thus,
inadvertently describing the "official" collapse story
perfectly.
Evidence for this is, Mark Walsh's use of the term "Ground Zero" in
his famous interview, which later became the "official" name
of the destruction area. Was this a coincidence that Mark Walsh called it
"Ground Zero" or does this suggest the information came from an
"official" organisation such as Fox News who might have had scripted
information fed to them and then communicated to their reporters and freelance
employees at the scene in NYC, like Mark Walsh for example, who most likely
unknowingly repeated the "official" collapse story?
After all, Mark's "initial" account of the "second"
airplane crash was accurate and consistent with the observable video evidence
and his vantage location where he witnessed it from. This is never an option of
consideration in the 9/11 research community. Does this make Mark Walsh a
conspirator, or an employee who was unknowingly used in the conspiracy?
I believe this could be a possibility and should be considered before accusing
people of being part of a conspiracy, especially the "wrong" people
such as Mark Adrian Humphries who had no involvement in 9/11 or was a crisis
actor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.