Monday, May 13, 2024

A Strange Encounter: Who was the male in Flight 93's co-pilot seat?

By Mark Conlon

On the morning of 9/11, Anthony F. Mazza was working at Newark Airport as a fuelling technician. One of the planes he provided with fuel was United Airlines 'Flight 93'. In the cockpit of the plane he met a person who was apparently neither Leroy Homer, Jr, the co-pilot, nor Jason Dahl, the pilot.

On Oct. 19, 2001, Anthony F. Mazza was interviewed by the FBI. Here's the FBI report: 

Anthony F. Mazza, Mazza worked as a fueler for Ogden Aviation Services at Newark International Airport since 1973. Mazza fuelled United Airlines ‘Flight 93’ on September 11, 2001 prior to its departure and crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that everything seemed normal on the flight including the amount of fuel that was pumped into Flight 93's tank. Mazza stated that prior to the passengers boarding Flight 93, he had completed fuelling the plane and proceeded to the cockpit to inform the co-pilot of the completed task. This has been the standard operating procedure for United flights out of Newark for many years. Mazza entered the cockpit where he handed the fuelling sheet to a young Caucasian male, well groomed, brown hair and a white shirt, who was sitting in the co-pilot's seat. The male responded to Mazza by saying thank you and taking the paper from him. Mazza then departed Flight 93 prior to the passengers boarding. Mazza stated that this was approximately 30 minutes prior to the scheduled departure time. Mazza was interviewed by FAA employee John Patani shortly after the crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that he reported that there was nothing unusual on the day of the flight and that the plane had been fuelled without incident

On Friday, October 12, 2001 Mazza saw a memorial for the crew of Flight 93 and saw pictures of the co-pilot of Flight 93. The picture was the actual co-pilot of Flight 93, who was Leroy Homer. Mazza stated that he was certain that the co-pilot he spoke with was not Mr. Homer.

Who was the "male" in the co-pilot's seat, if it wasn't neither Leroy Homer nor Jason Dahl, the pilot? After seeing the memorial, Mazza obviously took the initiative to contact the FBI. Had he identified Dahl - whose picture he certainly saw, too - as the "male", he would not have felt compelled to call the FBI? When interviewing Mazza, the FBI surely asked him about this possibility and probably showed photos of Dahl again. In any case, the absence of Dahl in the report makes it clear that he was not the "male" either, and Dahl was 43 years old, not really a young man like the "male" as described by Mazza.

Jere Longman describes the United Airlines routine pre-flight procedures:  

Before the passengers board a plane, it has to be checked, of course. Basically the captain looks after the cockpit instruments along a pre-flight checklist while the first officer checks the plane outside (tires etc.)

The fact that Mazza met neither Dahl nor Homer is even more compelling than the presence of the "male". Again, is this further evidence indicating that duplicate airplanes were involved on 9/11? As I mentioned earlier, it is now known that according to United Airlines ACARS messages, UAL 93 took-off at 8:28 a.m. in stark contradiction to the "official" take-off time of 8:42 a.m.

Original Article Source:


Saturday, May 11, 2024

Preview Trailer: 9/11 Planes Research, Interviewed on the Jerm Warfare Podcast

By Mark Conlon

I haven't been doing many interviews since 2021. However, I was invited to speak about my research by Jeremy Nell from the Jerm Warfare podcast show. Jeremy allowed me the time to take his viewers through all the research I have been doing for the last 14 years. Here’s a short trailer preview of my appearance on the Jerm Warfare podcast show, where I breakdown the evidence data, which proves that none of the 4 named planes in the official narrative crashed into the 4 named targets on 9/11. I also show evidence that the 4 planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. Finally, I also discuss what we were seeing hitting the towers, and also the hidden technology involved

Please support and sign-up to Jerm Warfare's website for early access to my interview, and many more interviews he's done with a number of other great alternative knowledge researchers.

Sign-up here:

Thursday, May 9, 2024

A Presentation Discussing The Official Evidence & Telemetry Data of Flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93

By Mark Conlon

In this Power Point presentation, I discuss the "official" evidence and telemetry data of flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93. I also explore many of the anomalies and discrepancies surrounding the official evidence.

I will leave the viewer to draw their own conclusions from what is presented in this presentation.

Thanks for watching and Caring! 

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Selection of Interviews Talking About Training Exercises Involving Hijacked Planes Pre-9/11

By Mark Conlon

Here's a selection of interviews talking about training exercises drills involving hijacked planes pre-9/11. These videos were uploaded on Shoestring's YouTube Channel. 

Exercise Was Held Shortly Before 9/11 Based on the Scenario of 'a Jetliner Striking the Pentagon'


Two clinics at the Pentagon held a training exercise in the summer of 2001 that, presciently, was based around the scenario of an airliner crashing into the Pentagon. This is revealed by John Baxter, who was commander of the Air Force Flight Medicine Clinic at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Baxter recalls that in the summer of 2001, he and James Geiling, then commander of the DiLorenzo Tricare Health Clinic, discussed having a joint exercise between their two clinics. They "decided on a scenario of a jetliner striking the Pentagon at the heliport," Baxter says. They didn't envision the crash being the result of terrorism, though. Instead, they were thinking about the fact that planes coming in to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport turned right over the Pentagon as they made their final approach to the airport. The two men therefore "thought it would be a somewhat realistic scenario that one of these airliners could get off course, get their altitude wrong, have a mechanical problem, and strike the Pentagon." The resulting exercise helped them identify a few "issues that were deficient" and correct these problems before the Pentagon was attacked on September 11 that year. This is an excerpt from episode 162 of the podcast series, "Borne the Battle," which was released on September 11, 2019.

C-130 Cargo Planes Sometimes Played Hijacked Aircraft in Military Exercises, NORAD Employee Reveals


A woman who was working as an ID technician at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) on September 11, 2001, reveals that a C-130--a type of military cargo aircraft--would sometimes be used to play a hijacked plane in NORAD training exercises. The ID tech--either Shelley Watson or Stacie Rountree--explains that when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was involved in NORAD exercises, "the majority of the time we had a military aircraft, real-world, out there flying over land, coming into our area where we were gonna hold the exercise." The ID tech goes on to specify that the military aircraft playing a hijacked plane in the exercise could be a C-130, saying that the FAA would be instructed, "This guy's a C-130, he's gonna fake these guys out, he's gonna pretend he's hijacked, don't tell [NEADS] who it is." This clip is taken from "Team 8 Interview with Maureen Dooley, Shelley Watson, and Stacie Roundtree of the Northeast Air Defense Sector." 9/11 Commission, October 27, 2003, . The clip begins just over 55 minutes into the full audio file. Image credit: Stacia Rountree / Eastern Air Defense Sector.

United Airlines Held a Realistic Drill 12 Days Before 9/11 That Simulated One of Its Planes Crashing


Andy Studdert, chief operating officer of United Airlines on September 11, 2001, describes a shockingly realistic "no-notice drill" he arranged that was held on August 30, 2001. In it, airline employees were led to believe one of their Boeing 747s had crashed while flying over the Pacific Ocean, on its way to Australia. Studdert initially allowed personnel in the airline's operations center to think the crash was real. Many of them were devastated. There were "people throwing up in the hall" and "people crying," Studdert recalls. Only after half an hour did he reveal the truth, announcing, "This has been a no-notice drill, there is no event, everything's fine." Twelve days later, two United Airlines planes were hijacked as part of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Studdert claims that many people subsequently came up to him and thanked him because, as a result of his drill, "we were ready" on September 11. This is an excerpt from "Preparing Your Organization for a Crisis: Lessons From United Airlines Emergency Preparation, Pre-9/11," an interview with Andy Studdert by the Center for Values-Driven Leadership at Benedictine University on February 27, 2012.

Pre-9/11 Hijack Exercise Involved an American Airlines Plane with Real People Playing Its Passengers


Colin Scoggins, a military operations specialist at the FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, describes a joint FAA/military training exercise held in 1995 or 1996 in which a real American Airlines aircraft apparently played the part of a hijacked plane and this aircraft "actually had passengers on board." Notably, two of the aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11--Flight 11 and Flight 77--were also American Airlines planes. This audio is a taken from Scoggins's interview with the 9/11 Commission on September 24, 2003.

Thursday, January 11, 2024

United 93: Nicole Carol Miller Photograph & Misinformation

By Mark Conlon

A photo of United 93 passenger Nicole Carol Miller at Newark Airport has been circulating the internet, which is thought to show Nicole about to board her flight, United 93 on 9/11. After extensive research into the original "uncropped" photograph which I obtained, I can now confirm that the photograph was most likely taken a couple days before 9/11. If look closely you can see the AA logo on the boarding sign. The photo appears to be taken as Nicole was boarding an American Airlines flight, not a United flight.

Nicole was on vacation in NYC and NJ. Nicole was originally due to fly back to San Jose, California on the 10th September, according to her father, however because of a thunderstorm on the evening of 10th September, it forced Nicole to be rescheduled onto United 'Flight 93' the next morning, 11th September 2001.

Below, I can share an exclusive uncropped version of the photograph of Nicole, which to my knowledge is a very rare version of the photograph.

I have also obtained a short piece of video footage of Nicole at a family wedding. I hope this clears up the misinformation which has been circulating the internet about this photograph. 

Thanks for reading, until my next blog post. 

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

American Airlines "Flight 77" Official DCC Radar Flight Path Evidence (Visual Study)

By Mark Conlon

In this video I discuss American Airlines Flight 77's "official" DCC Radar flight path, using the "official" radar evidence which was obtained under a Freedom of Information Act. (FOIA). The DCC Radar data has not been seen by the public until its release. The DCC radar data coordinates were very different to the Rades84 coordinates, which is a major conflict for the "official" narrative. The DCC Radar evidence is also backed-up by FAA & NORAD communication recordings and transcripts, showing that AA77 did not turn around on the Kentucky OHIO boarder, and head back towards Washington, but continued in its flight path towards Falmouth, St Louis and Missouri and into Kansas, before heading back again towards Missouri and then back to Kansas, then disappearing off radar. 

Thank you all for your interest in my research. Please Like or Subscribe to my channel, and feel free to leave a comment or feedback. I do try to interact with my subscribers who leave comments.

Thursday, November 30, 2023

AA77 - Official Rades84 & DCC Radar Flight Path Anomalies

By Mark Conlon

In this video I discuss the discrepancies between American Airlines Flight 77's flight path, using two different pieces of "official" radar evidence, between the Rades84 radar data and DCC radar data. The DCC radar data was only released under a Freedom of Information request, and has not been seen by the public until its release. I also discuss "official" Air Traffic Control (ATC) transcripts evidence, which backs up the DCC radar data coordinates, along with CNN News coverage, showing Flight Explorer radar path for AA77, no making a turn back towards Washington.

Thank you all for your interest in my research. Please follow my blog, or subscribe to my YouTube channel, and leave a like or comment.