By Mark Conlon
This is a short analysis where I examine a claim made by Steve De'ak during an interview with Jim Fetzer on the 26th March 2017. De'ak claimed the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video "freezes" and has no movement in the video during the plane crash sequence frames. After hearing this claim, I decided to conduct a short analysis on the 13th April 2017, and I am publishing the findings here after clarifying some information from Steve De'ak on the 10th July 2017.
The reason for asking Steve De'ak for clarification was because I was unsure of
the exact time-frame he was referring to in the video footage. This is what
lead me to conduct two different time-frame studies of the video footage
smoke/fumes plume. See the both analysis findings below.
See below: "close-up" comparison of the
smoke/fumes plume characteristic differences in the different frames, from just
before the plane "crashes" into the South Tower to
when the plane "impacts" the South Tower.
The two analysis studies above "conclusively" demonstrate that the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage was "NOT" frozen in the frames as Steve De'ak claimed.
Information update:
After some back and to comments with Steve De'ak through his
YouTube channel I can now confirm on 10th July 2017 that Steve De'ak told me he
has "retracted" his claims for "frozen" smoke/fumes
in the Michael Hezarkhani video. Just to note, this isn't about me being right,
and De'ak being wrong. Steve has obviously looked closer at new information and
re-evaluated his own position. This is what "good"
investigators do, not being solely fixed to one idea/theory. So, I commend
Steve for being open, and reconsidering new information.
See below:
Although this might solve this matter of frozen smoke/fumes,
it doesn't solve the "new" claims which Steve De'ak is
proposing about the Michael Hezarkhani video, which I will be addressing in
another blog soon.
What I can say is, "false" claims are being circulated across
the internet about the Michael Hezarkhani video footage which has been a
pattern over a long period of time ostensibly to "discredit"
the 9/11 video footage and portray it as fake video, something which I have
written about at length in other blog posts. The question that has to be asked:
Why is it so important to discredit this piece of video footage?
It came as no surprise to me to discover how this figured in the recent timeline of events in the “perception management” of this piece of video evidence.
Please read this interesting article written by Andrew Johnson of
checktheevidence.com regarding Steve De'ak's - 9/11 Crash Test. Link below:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=359&Itemid=60
This case is now closed...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.