Math Easy Solutions (MES) arranged this live 9/11 roundtable
discussion debate Saturday 31st August 2024. I would like to thank Mat for inviting me to be part of the panel debate discussing planes and advanced technology aspects of 9/11.
Guests Speakers:
- Andrew Johnson aka Check The Evidence
- Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research
- Adam Eisenberg Pentagon whistleblower
- Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist
- William aka That's Life But Not As We Know It (TLBNAWKI)
- Chris Bergier, Aerospace engineer from Boston 9/11 Truth
- Keith aka Dr. Judy Wood's friend - Methylminer
On the morning of 9/11, Anthony F. Mazza was working at
Newark Airport as a fuelling technician. One of the planes he provided with
fuel was United Airlines 'Flight 93'. In the cockpit of the plane he met a
person who was apparently neither Leroy Homer, Jr, the co-pilot, nor Jason
Dahl, the pilot.
On Oct. 19, 2001, Anthony F. Mazza was interviewed by the
FBI. Here's the FBI report:
Anthony F. Mazza, Mazza worked as a fueler for Ogden Aviation Services at
Newark International Airport since 1973. Mazza fuelled United Airlines ‘Flight
93’ on September 11, 2001 prior to its departure and crash in western
Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that everything seemed normal on the flight
including the amount of fuel that was pumped into Flight 93's tank. Mazza
stated that prior to the passengers boarding Flight 93, he had completed
fuelling the plane and proceeded to the cockpit to inform the co-pilot of the
completed task. This has been the standard operating procedure for United
flights out of Newark for many years. Mazza entered the cockpit where he handed
the fuelling sheet to a young Caucasian male, well groomed, brown hair and a
white shirt, who was sitting in the co-pilot's seat. The male responded to
Mazza by saying thank you and taking the paper from him. Mazza then departed
Flight 93 prior to the passengers boarding. Mazza stated that this was approximately
30 minutes prior to the scheduled departure time. Mazza was interviewed by FAA
employee John Patani shortly after the crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza
stated that he reported that there was nothing unusual on the day of the flight
and that the plane had been fuelled without incident
On Friday, October 12, 2001 Mazza saw a memorial for the
crew of Flight 93 and saw pictures of the co-pilot of Flight 93. The picture
was the actual co-pilot of Flight 93, who was Leroy Homer. Mazza stated that he
was certain that the co-pilot he spoke with was not Mr. Homer. http://www.911myths.com/images/e/ed/Team7_Box12_LeroyHomer.pdf
Who was the "male" in the co-pilot's seat, if it
wasn't neither Leroy Homer nor Jason Dahl, the pilot? After seeing the
memorial, Mazza obviously took the initiative to contact the FBI. Had he
identified Dahl - whose picture he certainly saw, too - as the "male",
he would not have felt compelled to call the FBI? When interviewing Mazza, the
FBI surely asked him about this possibility and probably showed photos of Dahl
again. In any case, the absence of Dahl in the report makes it clear that he was
not the "male" either, and Dahl was 43 years old, not really a young
man like the "male" as described by Mazza.
Jere Longman describes the United Airlines routine
pre-flight procedures:
Before the passengers board a plane, it has to be
checked, of course. Basically the captain looks after the cockpit instruments
along a pre-flight checklist while the first officer checks the plane outside
(tires etc.).
The fact that Mazza met neither Dahl nor Homer is even more
compelling than the presence of the "male". Again, is this further
evidence indicating that duplicate airplanes were involved on 9/11? As I
mentioned earlier, it is now known that according to United Airlines ACARS
messages, UAL 93 took-off at 8:28 a.m. in stark contradiction to the
"official" take-off time of 8:42 a.m.
I haven't been doing many interviews since 2021. However, I
was invited to speak about my research by Jeremy Nell from the Jerm Warfare
podcast show. Jeremy allowed me the time to take his viewers through all the
research I have been doing for the last 14 years. Here’s a short trailer
preview of my appearance on the Jerm Warfare podcast show, where I breakdown
the evidence data, which proves that none of the 4 named planes in the official
narrative crashed into the 4 named targets on 9/11. I also show evidence that the
4 planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. Finally, I also
discuss what we were seeing hitting the towers, and also the hidden technology
involved
Please support and sign-up to Jerm Warfare's website for
early access to my interview, and many more interviews he's done with a number
of other great alternative knowledge researchers.
In this Power Point presentation, I discuss the "official" evidence and
telemetry data of flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93. I also explore many of the anomalies and
discrepancies surrounding the official evidence.
I will leave the viewer to draw their own conclusions from what is presented in this presentation.
Here's a selection of interviews talking about training exercises drills involving hijacked planes pre-9/11. These videos were uploaded on Shoestring's YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@Shoestring911
Exercise Was Held Shortly Before 9/11 Based on the
Scenario of 'a Jetliner Striking the Pentagon'
Two clinics at the Pentagon held a training exercise in the summer of 2001
that, presciently, was based around the scenario of an airliner crashing into
the Pentagon. This is revealed by John Baxter, who was commander of the Air
Force Flight Medicine Clinic at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Baxter recalls
that in the summer of 2001, he and James Geiling, then commander of the
DiLorenzo Tricare Health Clinic, discussed having a joint exercise between
their two clinics. They "decided on a scenario of a jetliner striking the
Pentagon at the heliport," Baxter says. They didn't envision the crash
being the result of terrorism, though. Instead, they were thinking about the
fact that planes coming in to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
turned right over the Pentagon as they made their final approach to the
airport. The two men therefore "thought it would be a somewhat realistic
scenario that one of these airliners could get off course, get their altitude
wrong, have a mechanical problem, and strike the Pentagon." The resulting
exercise helped them identify a few "issues that were deficient" and
correct these problems before the Pentagon was attacked on September 11 that
year. This is an excerpt from episode 162 of the podcast series, "Borne
the Battle," which was released on September 11, 2019.
C-130 Cargo Planes Sometimes Played Hijacked Aircraft in Military Exercises,
NORAD Employee Reveals
A woman who was working as an ID technician at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense
Sector (NEADS) on September 11, 2001, reveals that a C-130--a type of military
cargo aircraft--would sometimes be used to play a hijacked plane in NORAD
training exercises. The ID tech--either Shelley Watson or Stacie
Rountree--explains that when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was
involved in NORAD exercises, "the majority of the time we had a military
aircraft, real-world, out there flying over land, coming into our area where we
were gonna hold the exercise." The ID tech goes on to specify that the
military aircraft playing a hijacked plane in the exercise could be a C-130,
saying that the FAA would be instructed, "This guy's a C-130, he's gonna
fake these guys out, he's gonna pretend he's hijacked, don't tell [NEADS] who
it is." This clip is taken from "Team 8 Interview with Maureen
Dooley, Shelley Watson, and Stacie Roundtree of the Northeast Air Defense
Sector." 9/11 Commission, October 27, 2003, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/20701...
. The clip begins just over 55 minutes into the full audio file. Image credit:
Stacia Rountree / Eastern Air Defense Sector.
United Airlines Held a Realistic Drill 12 Days Before 9/11 That Simulated
One of Its Planes Crashing
Andy Studdert, chief operating officer of United Airlines on
September 11, 2001, describes a shockingly realistic "no-notice
drill" he arranged that was held on August 30, 2001. In it, airline
employees were led to believe one of their Boeing 747s had crashed while flying
over the Pacific Ocean, on its way to Australia. Studdert initially allowed
personnel in the airline's operations center to think the crash was real. Many
of them were devastated. There were "people throwing up in the hall"
and "people crying," Studdert recalls. Only after half an hour did he
reveal the truth, announcing, "This has been a no-notice drill, there is
no event, everything's fine." Twelve days later, two United Airlines
planes were hijacked as part of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Studdert claims
that many people subsequently came up to him and thanked him because, as a
result of his drill, "we were ready" on September 11. This is an
excerpt from "Preparing Your Organization for a Crisis: Lessons From
United Airlines Emergency Preparation, Pre-9/11," an interview with Andy
Studdert by the Center for Values-Driven Leadership at Benedictine University
on February 27, 2012.
Pre-9/11 Hijack Exercise Involved an American Airlines
Plane with Real People Playing Its Passengers
Colin Scoggins, a military operations specialist at the
FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, describes a joint FAA/military
training exercise held in 1995 or 1996 in which a real American Airlines
aircraft apparently played the part of a hijacked plane and this aircraft
"actually had passengers on board." Notably, two of the aircraft that
were hijacked on 9/11--Flight 11 and Flight 77--were also American Airlines
planes. This audio is a taken from Scoggins's interview with the 9/11 Commission
on September 24, 2003.
A photo of United 93 passenger Nicole Carol Miller at Newark Airport has been circulating the internet, which is
thought to show Nicole about to board her flight, United 93 on 9/11. After extensive
research into the original "uncropped" photograph which I obtained, I
can now confirm that the photograph was most likely taken a couple days before 9/11. If look closely you can see the AA logo on the boarding sign. The photo appears to be taken as Nicole was boarding an American
Airlines flight, not a United flight.
Nicole was on vacation in
NYC and NJ. Nicole was originally due to fly back to San
Jose, California on the 10th September, according to her father, however because
of a thunderstorm on the evening of 10th September, it forced
Nicole to be rescheduled onto United 'Flight 93' the next morning, 11th
September 2001.
Below, I can share an exclusive uncropped
version of the photograph of Nicole, which to my knowledge is a very rare version of the photograph.
I have also obtained a short piece of video footage of
Nicole at a family wedding. I hope this clears up the misinformation which has been circulating the internet about this photograph.
In this video I discuss
American Airlines Flight 77's "official" DCC Radar flight path, using
the "official" radar evidence which was obtained under a Freedom of
Information Act. (FOIA). The DCC Radar data has not been seen by the public
until its release. The DCC radar data coordinates were very different to the
Rades84 coordinates, which is a major conflict for the "official"
narrative. The DCC Radar evidence is also backed-up by FAA & NORAD
communication recordings and transcripts, showing that AA77 did not turn around
on the Kentucky OHIO boarder, and head back towards Washington, but continued
in its flight path towards Falmouth, St Louis and Missouri and into Kansas,
before heading back again towards Missouri and then back to Kansas, then disappearing
off radar.
Thank you all for your interest in my research. Please Like or Subscribe to my channel, and feel free to leave a comment or feedback. I do try to interact with my subscribers who leave comments.
